In barely six months, the U.S. Department of Agriculture has lost one-in-six employees while racing ahead with Secretary Brooke Rollins’ sweeping reorganization blueprint. More than 15,300 workers—roughly 15 percent of the entire department—have accepted voluntary buyouts or early-retirement packages just as USDA begins consolidating operations and relocating thousands of Washington-based staff to five regional hubs. The scale of the exodus, coupled with plans to vacate landmark facilities and freeze most hiring, has set up a political and operational stress-test unlike anything the “People’s Department” has faced in decades.
Headlines at a Glance
| Key Metric | Detail |
|---|---|
| Total departures since April 30 | 15,364 employees (≈15% of workforce) |
| Median buyout/early-exit incentive | $25,000 per employee |
| Agencies hit hardest | Natural Resources Conservation Service (-2,408), Animal & Plant Health Inspection Service (-1,377), Farm Service Agency (-674), Food Safety & Inspection Service (-555) |
| Relocations planned | Up to 2,600 Washington-area jobs moved to Raleigh, Kansas City, Indianapolis, Fort Collins and Salt Lake City |
| Hiring outlook | Freeze through Oct. 15 2025; staffing capped at Dec 2019 levels |
| Legal backdrop | Nationwide injunction on mass layoffs lifted by Supreme Court June 27, but individual RIF cases continue |
Read more: Amazon Lists Nearly 5,500 H-1B Job Openings with $153K Median Salary
Why the Stampede Began
1. Voluntary Buyouts and Deferred Resignations
USDA twice opened a “deferred resignation program” in January and April, offering lump-sum payments up to $25,000 plus continued salary and benefits through September 30 to anyone who quit early. Many workers interpreted the offer as a veiled warning that reductions-in-force (RIFs) or forced relocations were imminent, prompting thousands to lock in exit money rather than risk involuntary separation later.
2. Reorganization Anxiety
Secretary Rollins’ July 24 memo formalized a four-pillar overhaul: (a) shrink payroll to match finances, (b) relocate headquarters staff out of the high-cost National Capital Region, (c) strip away “layers of bureaucracy,” and (d) consolidate back-office functions under a single Assistant Secretary for Administration. The prospect of uprooting families or switching job series has fueled resignations, especially among mid-career specialists.
3. Legal Whiplash
From March to July, USDA employees endured a roller-coaster of court orders. Two federal judges temporarily reinstated thousands of fired probationary workers, only for the Supreme Court to stay those injunctions, effectively green-lighting agency RIF plans. The uncertainty—and the possibility that future lawsuits may still topple specific RIFs—pushed many fence-sitters to grab the buyout while it was guaranteed.
Anatomy of the Rollins Reorganization
Relocation Map
| New Regional Hub | Agencies Dominant | Locality Pay vs. D.C. | Notable Facility Changes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raleigh, NC | Food Safety, Research | 22.24% vs. 33.94% | Gains microbiology labs |
| Kansas City, MO | Economic Analysis, Grants | 18.97% | Builds on 2019 ERS/NIFA move |
| Indianapolis, IN | Farm Programs | 18.15% | New shared service center |
| Fort Collins, CO | Forest Service, Climate Science | 30.52% | Consolidates nine Forest Service regions |
| Salt Lake City, UT | Conservation, Tribal Relations | 17.06% | Hosts NRCS western leadership |
Management Slim-Down
- Forest Service will phase out nine regional offices within a year, merging research stations into a single Fort Collins H.
- Food & Nutrition Service will collapse seven regions into five, aligning with hub cities.
- Agricultural Research Service eliminates its area offices; National Programs Office absorbs oversight.
- Shared Services: HR, procurement, leasing and grants administration migrate into the Assistant Secretary for Administration, cutting duplicate desks by an estimated 1,200 positions.
Where the Workforce Was Hit Hardest
| USDA Mission Area | Pre-2025 Staffing | Exits 2025 YTD | % Lost | Core Services at Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natural Resources Conservation Service | ~11,500 | 2,408 | 20.9% | Conservation planning, EQIP contracts |
| Animal & Plant Health Inspection Service | ~8,600 | 1,377 | 16.0% | Avian-flu, pest surveillance |
| Farm Service Agency | ~11,000 | 674 | 6.1% | Direct farm loans, disaster payments |
| Food Safety & Inspection Service | ~9,300 | 555 | 6.0% | Meat & poultry plant inspection |
| Agricultural Research Service | ~8,500 | 1,255 | 14.8% | Crop genetics, climate labs |
| Marketing & Regulatory Programs (AMS + APHIS) | ~11,500 | 1,846 | 16.1% | Commodity grading, market news |
Percentages based on latest USDA staffing tables released to congressional committees in May 2025.
The Legal Minefield
- Deferred Resignation Lawsuits: Two district courts (N.D. Calif. and D. Md.) ruled that USDA’s mass firings likely violated civil-service statutes, ordering temporary reinstatement.
- Supreme Court Intervention: On June 27 the Court narrowed nationwide injunction power but left APA-based agency-specific challenges alive, effectively lifting the broad hiring freeze ban.
- RIF Transparency Fight: Judge Susan Illston demanded USDA’s detailed RIF plans; the Ninth Circuit stayed that disclosure pending appeal.
- Injunction on Individual Agencies: NRCS, APHIS and others must still justify unit-specific layoffs under ongoing lawsuits, causing patchwork uncertainty.
Service Disruptions Farmers Already Notice
- Longer Loan Queues: FSA county offices now operate with skeleton crews, extending farm-loan approvals from 30 days to 90-plus days in some states.
- Backlog in Conservation Contracts: NRCS told remaining employees to “lateral transfer” into 700 unfilled soil-conservationist slots, yet a hiring freeze delays new hires until mid-October.
- Inspection Coverage Gaps: FSIS rotated inspectors between plants to cover shifts after losing 555 staff; unions report 12 percent rise in waivers to allow higher line speeds.
- Grant Cycle Delays: NIFA competitive-research awards slipped four months behind schedule because grant management teams shrank by more than half—a repeat of the 2019 Kansas City relocation fallout.
Read more: How PayPal and NPCI Are Taking India’s UPI to the World Stage
Voices from the Field
“I have a Ph.D. in plant pathology and three kids in high school. A $25,000 buyout doesn’t cover uprooting to another hub city. I took the payout because I couldn’t gamble on a forced move.”
— Former ARS scientist, Beltsville
“They’re asking me to transfer into a ‘critical vacancy’ with no guarantee my new role survives October. That’s a hard sell.”
— Current NRCS soil conservationist in Iowa
Labor unions accuse USDA of engineering a “stealth RIF” by dangling exit cash while freezing new hiring, draining expertise without triggering statutory layoff protections.
What Comes Next
Timeline to Watch
| Date | Milestone | Implication |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 15 2025 | Agencies submit phased transfer rosters to OMB | Final list of employees forced to move or leave |
| Sept 30 2025 | Paid status ends for deferred-resignation participants | Knowledge drain becomes permanent |
| Oct 15 2025 | Hiring freeze review | USDA may seek limited waivers to backfill safety-critical posts |
| Dec 31 2025 | Staff cap pegged to Dec 2019 headcount | Geography-neutral remote roles face elimination |
Potential Scenarios
- Targeted RIFs: Should voluntary attrition fall short of budget targets, USDA could initiate office-by-office layoffs after Supreme Court green light.
- Congressional Intervention: Bipartisan farm-state lawmakers pressing for inspector exemptions may tie FY 2026 appropriations to staffing minimums for FSIS and APHIS.
- Further Relocations: Rollins hinted that additional labs and administrative units could move to Albuquerque or Minneapolis in FY 2026 once first-wave hubs are operational.
The Bigger Picture: Shrinking the Federal Footprint
USDA’s downsizing mirrors a government-wide directive—championed by the White House Office of Government Efficiency—to cut up to 260,000 civilian positions by 2027. With agriculture agencies historically employing sizable field forces, they represent a prime target for head-count reduction while maintaining a politically palatable “serve farmers better” narrative.
Takeaways for Stakeholders
- Expect Delays: Farmers, food processors and researchers should build in extra lead-time for loan approvals, grant cycles and inspection scheduling.
- Stay Engaged Locally: Many frontline offices remain staffed; relationships with local FSA and NRCS officers are more crucial than ever while regional structures shift.
- Watch the Courts: Program continuity could depend on the outcome of pending APA cases challenging specific USDA RIFs.
- Budget Advocacy: Industry groups lobbying appropriators for higher staffing floors and relocation allowances may influence FY 2026 resource levels.
The voluntary departure of more than 15,000 USDA employees marks the single largest talent loss in the department’s modern history. Whether Secretary Rollins’ reorganization ultimately delivers faster, leaner services—or precipitates a crippling expertise gap—will hinge on how swiftly USDA can rebuild critical teams amid hiring freezes, court battles and cross-country moves. For now, producers, scientists and rural communities must navigate a season of uncertainty as the “People’s Department” redraws its own map.
